Current Interpretation

Current Interpretation
VT: Allow to conceal weapons. Have the rights to carry a gun which requires no permit. and yet the 49th lowest crime rates in nation, 49th Citizens can carry a firearm without getting permission, without paying any fee, or without going through any kind of government-or insist on waiting line period. Some other countries, like Vermont, have the same law.

Interview

Interview

Name of Interviewee: Officer Brian Fox

Role/Job: Police

Summary of the Interview: I have just interviewed Brian Fox, police officer of Hinesburg supports the Second Amendment of Right to Bear Arms. It's a good deed to have guns to self-defend ourselves and protect others. He believes that there shouldn't be any restriction on guns beside full-automatic weapons. Brian Fox has said that anyone should be able to have the right to bear arms and shouldn't be restricted. He would like people to say they have a weapon in the vehicle concealed in their car. Overall, he supports the Second Amendment and thinks individuals should be allowed to have guns except any type of full-automatic weapon.

Panel Day Reflection

Panel Day Reflection
On Panel Day, there was a lot of questions being answered. They did introduce themselves to us and then explain about the "Right to Bear Arms". I think Officer Dempsey said that guns will no more be restricted in Vermont. To say something about that-- its sort of a good thing but the laws in Vermont is bad. Purchasing guns that doesn't require permit isn't right.

Stakeholders

Stakeholders

Would Allowing Students to Carry Weapons Make College Campuses Safer?

Some people believe that students should be allowed to conceal weapons on school campuses. A student had a shotgun on campus during a situation when a person with a handgun was trying to kill someone. The student held the shooter till the police arrived 11 minutes later. No one else had got wounded or killed. "The idea of using guns for self-defense in schools is gaining serious traction." 85% of Americans consider it appropriate for principals and or teachers to use them. Guns at school, defending the lives of students would stop the outrageous massacre.


Other people believe that guns in school are bad. Students at a young-adult age possess guns and conceal them in their bags or pants. Guns are harmful because many people are afraid of handguns or any type of weapon. Us humans do and don't use guns properly, chances are that people would use gun to kill themselves, attack someone with it, or homicide. "Thus, the policy solution advocated by the gun lobby to arm all students may well make it easier for those bent on carrying out destruction to bring guns onto campus."

Monday, April 11, 2011

Guns for the Common Good

“Guns for the Common Good”

An Armed Society is a Polite Society. Gun owners, in contrast, take the responsibility of owning, and where legal, carrying a gun very seriously although, owning and carrying a gun is an overwhelming responsibility. That is the reason when concealed carry laws pass there isn’t a huge increase in rage crimes or spree killings with guns.


The following things are required for responsible gun ownership.First, an honest trust of our citizens and solid desire to allow them to go armed if they so choose. Second, the self-control to handle situations while armed that don’t require the use of deadly force without bringing into mass chaos. The same reasons explain the basic and truthful statement that an armed society is a polite society.

Self-defense is a human right. Enduring the law, citizens should avoid using deadly force to protect themselves, their families and their businesses, unless they have no other option to avoid death or risk of serious injury. Remember that you’re firing only to stop an attack. If the person dies as a result of you doing your best to stop his attack, that’s his problem, not yours. If our lives are endangered by plots, violence, armed robbers, or enemies, any and every way of doing something of protecting ourselves is morally right.

“The Second Amendment in the Bill of Rights that protects the rights of the people to keep and bear arms.” -(Previous Blog Post) Guns save lives because it is possible that guns save more lives than they cost. Gun can sometimes prevent crime and perhaps even save a victim’s life. “Criminals are less likely to attack someone that they believe might be armed.” -(Previous Blog PostA person may feel safer being armed with a handgun and feel free to go out to anywhere, even when near any dangerous areas.

People need protection from harm. They also need protection of property and family. Guns are not bad to have. Some guns go through their entire life being shot only at targets, and never at a person or thing. It really just depends on the person behind them. A good person behind a gun will protect his/her family and that will be with the gun. A bad person will use a gun for revenge or other crimes. If a child is under ten-seeing and getting hold of a gun while no adults are supervising- that child could immediately kill himself/herself. While there are some who should not be trusted with guns, there are others that absolutely need them.

The 2nd Amendment did not get into the “Bill of Rights” by accident. It was put there to give the people the final say in our government’s system. We certainly wish that no children should have guns. Children on’t know the use of it but finding out how while holding a gun, is critical and determined. I suggest hiding the gun at higher places or somewhere to lock it up. Take “Responsibility” for your life, liberty, and happiness, go buy a “GUN”. Protection is needed; this is why our society has guns to help keep the U.S clean without chaos.

5 comments:

  1. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Very nice editorial! I feel that your plan and opinion could possibly work, but what if we look at this scenario from a Hobbes Perspective? Misuse of guns happens everyday, because a person's true personality and ethics isn't full-proof; there are always accidents. If people were allowed to freely carry guns in public, they could be used as an excuse to "quickly" and "efficiently" take care of an issue or debate. We would have to be taught at a very young age and almost programmed to deal with issues in a calm and healthy way, and to not resort to the violent weapons that we have been given the legal right to wield.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Good job on the editorial. I agree that guns are sometimes a good thing and that they are needed in some situations. I also agree that people should take owning guns very seriously, and that they should know their power. I do not, however, I agree that everyone should have a gun. I think that their should be heavy background checks on people looking to buy guns and that their should be more restrictions on who can get them. I believe that this will help keep guns out of the wrong hands. I think you're right that children should be taught from a young age about the dangers and powers of guns. Nice Job.

    ReplyDelete
  4. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I agree with you that gun owners need to take guns seriously and understand their place of power in the society. I do not believe though that everyone should carry around a gun. Guns are extremely dangerous, and you can never know when a person can snap. Basically in my opinion when you hold a gun, you’re holding everyone around your person’s life in your hand, and that is way too much power for one to handle. I agree with Hans above that everyone should get deep background checks to be able to carry a gun, but this only needs to be done if they were to carry it in public, but i believe that in homes, with proper training it is perfectly fine to own a gun and keep it locked up or away from children. This is just to protect your home and family and is a last ditch effort to maybe saving them from a dangerous scenario. With that said, great post Marshall!

    ReplyDelete